Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSACX
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$51.85
Change+$0.63 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.66
Change+$0.11 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.26M
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSACX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSACX (40.3M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKTX (0.88) vs GSACX (0.26). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKTX (0) vs GSACX (1000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.44 vs. FHKTX (46.71). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 6.92 vs. GSACX (-27.50).
| FHKTX | GSACX | FHKTX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.21 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 3.05 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.612 | 32.569 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 40.3M | 3,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.26 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.71 | 51.44 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.85 | 22.36 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.92 | -27.50 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.55 | 25.27 | 366% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement