Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSACX
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$47.47
Change-$0.48 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$20.88
Change-$0.47 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.73M
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSACX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSACX (37.7M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKTX (0.93) vs GSACX (0.28). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKTX (0) vs GSACX (1000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.84 vs. FHKTX (35.39). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.73 vs. GSACX (-33.57).
| FHKTX | GSACX | FHKTX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.21 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 3.05 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.018 | 25.514 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 37.7M | 3,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.28 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.39 | 40.84 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.13 | 5.01 | 980% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.73 | -33.57 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.27 | 19.66 | 434% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement