Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSACX
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSACX
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. GSACX (34.4M). GSACX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSACX (1.32) vs FHKTX (0.99). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKTX (18 years) vs GSACX (29 years). GSACX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKTX (250) vs GSACX (1000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.32 vs. GSACX (11.29). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.22 vs. GSACX (-31.20).
| FHKTX | GSACX | FHKTX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.21 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 3.10 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.679 | -1.224 | -2,260% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 34.4M | 7,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.32 | 11.29 | 463% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.84 | 23.28 | 463% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.22 | -31.20 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.52 | 16.11 | 1,182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers