Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.19
Change-$0.56 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.24
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.9M
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. LNGZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LNGZX (50.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: LNGZX (0.91) vs FHKTX (0.77). FHKTX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKTX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). FHKTX (1.43) and LNGZX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKTX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.00 vs. LNGZX (30.57). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.63 vs. LNGZX (-39.52).
| FHKTX | LNGZX | FHKTX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.39 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.162 | 29.048 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 50.9M | 3,562% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.00 | 30.57 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.56 | 29.35 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.63 | -39.52 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.58 | 21.38 | 382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement