Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.31
Change-$0.46 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$50.26
Change-$0.58 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.56M
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. LNGZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LNGZX (54.6M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: LNGZX (0.96) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKTX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). FHKTX (1.43) and LNGZX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKTX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX (31.81) and FHKTX (30.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.55 vs. LNGZX (-28.34).
| FHKTX | LNGZX | FHKTX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.39 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.477 | 36.317 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 54.6M | 2,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.96 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.88 | 31.81 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.62 | 36.45 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.55 | -28.34 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.51 | 47.07 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement