Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a StrongBuy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. LNGZX (41.4M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: LNGZX (2.16) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKTX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) and FHKTX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKTX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.23 vs. LNGZX (-2.16). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.49 vs. LNGZX (-44.22).
| FHKTX | LNGZX | FHKTX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.49 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.727 | -11.831 | -277% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 41.4M | 6,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 2.16 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.23 | -2.16 | -2,973% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.92 | 10.66 | 1,106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.49 | -44.22 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.89 | 18.12 | 1,131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers