Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MCSMX
FHKTX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MCSMX
FHKTX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. MCSMX (83M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MCSMX (1.77) vs FHKTX (0.96). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKTX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.83 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKTX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.36 vs. MCSMX (18.24). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.47 vs. MCSMX (-28.12).
| FHKTX | MCSMX | FHKTX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.40 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.57 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.231 | 20.367 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 83M | 3,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.36 | 18.24 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 127.62 | 44.57 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | -28.12 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.99 | 68.52 | 270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement