Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MMCFX
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.76
Change-$0.88 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$17.97
Change-$0.36 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.82M
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MMCFX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MMCFX (48.8M). MMCFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MMCFX (0.95) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) and FHKTX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKTX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.46 vs. MMCFX (20.37). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.83 vs. MMCFX (-53.16).
| FHKTX | MMCFX | FHKTX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.14 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.48 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.972 | 35.677 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 48.8M | 3,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.46 | 20.37 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.72 | 19.16 | 552% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.83 | -53.16 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.44 | -54.82 | -158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement