Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MMCFX
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MMCFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$50.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
AMG Veritas China N
Price$18.31
Change+$0.18 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.7M
FHKTX vs MMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MMCFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MMCFX (48.7M). MMCFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MMCFX (1.06) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MMCFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MMCFX (31 years). MMCFX (1.48) and FHKTX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . MMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCFX: FHKTX (0) vs MMCFX (2000). MMCFX (47.43) and FHKTX (46.09) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.14 vs. MMCFX (-49.35).
| FHKTX | MMCFX | FHKTX / MMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.14 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.48 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.745 | 34.197 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 48.7M | 2,844% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.09 | 47.43 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.21 | 4.20 | 1,623% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.14 | -49.35 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.00 | -56.93 | -170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement