Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs NGCAX
FHKTX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs NGCAX
FHKTX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. NGCAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. NGCAX (41.7M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: NGCAX (2.05) vs FHKTX (0.99). FHKTX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKTX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). NGCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKTX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.32 vs. NGCAX (-3.31). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 37.22 vs. NGCAX (-35.85).
| FHKTX | NGCAX | FHKTX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.74 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.679 | -10.137 | -273% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 41.7M | 6,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.05 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.32 | -3.31 | -1,580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.84 | 8.06 | 1,338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.22 | -35.85 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.52 | 16.22 | 1,175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers