Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs RBCRX
FHKTX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs RBCRX
FHKTX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. RBCRX (6.75M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: RBCRX (3.50) vs FHKTX (0.94). FHKTX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKTX (18 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKTX (250) vs RBCRX (250000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.17 vs. RBCRX (30.79).
| FHKTX | RBCRX | FHKTX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.00 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 6.74 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.584 | 0.243 | 14,248% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 6.75M | 40,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 3.50 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.17 | 30.79 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.42 | 48.95 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.03 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 235.41 | 36.15 | 651% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement