Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs WRCGX
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs WRCGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$47.00
Change-$0.49 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
William Blair China Growth R6
Price$6.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06M
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. WRCGX (2.06M). WRCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: WRCGX (1.30) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than WRCGX: FHKTX (17 years) vs WRCGX (4 years). WRCGX (9.39) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). WRCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRCGX: FHKTX (0) vs WRCGX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.11 vs. WRCGX (32.32).
| FHKTX | WRCGX | FHKTX / WRCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.94 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 9.39 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.809 | 17.045 | 146% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 2.06M | 63,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.30 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.11 | 32.32 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.55 | -8.40 | -554% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.88 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement