Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs WRCGX
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs WRCGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$47.48
Change-$0.47 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
William Blair China Growth R6
Price$6.39
Change-$0.17 (-2.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14M
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. WRCGX (2.14M). WRCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: WRCGX (1.19) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than WRCGX: FHKTX (17 years) vs WRCGX (4 years). WRCGX (9.39) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). WRCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRCGX: FHKTX (0) vs WRCGX (1000000). WRCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.36 vs. FHKTX (37.32).
| FHKTX | WRCGX | FHKTX / WRCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.94 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 9.39 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.783 | 21.023 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 2.14M | 64,841% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.19 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.32 | 40.36 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.19 | 2.12 | 2,600% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.55 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement