Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs WRCGX
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs WRCGX
FHKTX vs WRCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. WRCGX (2.44M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than WRCGX: FHKTX (0.94) vs WRCGX (0.82). FHKTX was incepted earlier than WRCGX: FHKTX (18 years) vs WRCGX (5 years). WRCGX (8.54) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). WRCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRCGX: FHKTX (250) vs WRCGX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 78.81 vs. WRCGX (31.97).
| FHKTX | WRCGX | FHKTX / WRCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.94 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 8.54 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.013 | 14.308 | 273% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 2.44M | 111,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.82 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 78.81 | 31.97 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.45 | 37.84 | 366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.21 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 247.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement