Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLKX vs HBLCX
FHLKX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FHLKX vs HBLCX
FHLKX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLKX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLKX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FHLKX (73.4M). FHLKX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FHLKX (2.91) vs HBLCX (2.43). FHLKX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FHLKX (7 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FHLKX (54.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FHLKX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. HBLCX (1.04). FHLKX return over 5 years is better than : 18.88 vs. HBLCX (0.48).
| FHLKX | HBLCX | FHLKX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.65 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.65 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.633 | 3.737 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 10.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.43 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 1.04 | 860% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.94 | 16.89 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.88 | 0.48 | 3,919% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement