Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLKX vs OICAX
FHLKX vs OICAX Comparison
Open Charts FHLKX vs OICAX
FHLKX vs OICAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLKX vs. OICAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLKX is a Hold and OICAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OICAX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. FHLKX (73.4M). OICAX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: OICAX (3.31) vs FHLKX (2.91). FHLKX was incepted earlier than OICAX: FHLKX (7 years) vs OICAX (30 years). OICAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). FHLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. OICAX (11.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than OICAX: FHLKX (0) vs OICAX (500). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. OICAX (2.56). FHLKX return over 5 years is better than : 18.88 vs. OICAX (7.88).
| FHLKX | OICAX | FHLKX / OICAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.93 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.93 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.633 | 2.424 | 274% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 4.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.31 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 2.56 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.94 | 23.72 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.88 | 7.88 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement