Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLKX vs ONCFX
FHLKX vs ONCFX Comparison
Open Charts FHLKX vs ONCFX
FHLKX vs ONCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLKX vs. ONCFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLKX is a Hold and ONCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONCFX has more cash in the bank: 4.34B vs. FHLKX (73.1M). ONCFX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: ONCFX (3.43) vs FHLKX (2.86). FHLKX was incepted earlier than ONCFX: FHLKX (6 years) vs ONCFX (30 years). ONCFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). FHLKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. ONCFX (11.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than ONCFX: FHLKX (0) vs ONCFX (1000000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. ONCFX (9.51). FHLKX return over 5 years is better than : 21.92 vs. ONCFX (12.22).
| FHLKX | ONCFX | FHLKX / ONCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.67 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.945 | 3.798 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000000 | - |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 4.34B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 3.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 9.51 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.42 | 25.70 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.92 | 12.22 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement