Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHLSX vs HBLCX
FHLSX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FHLSX vs HBLCX
FHLSX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHLSX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHLSX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FHLSX (73.4M). FHLSX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FHLSX (2.81) vs HBLCX (2.43). FHLSX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FHLSX (7 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FHLSX (0.50). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FHLSX (54.00). FHLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FHLSX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. HBLCX (0.36). FHLSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.84 vs. HBLCX (0.41).
| FHLSX | HBLCX | FHLSX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.65 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.65 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.837 | 3.595 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 10.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 2.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | 0.36 | 2,613% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 16.90 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.84 | 0.41 | 4,648% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement