Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHUMX vs FSMDX
FHUMX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FHUMX vs FSMDX
FHUMX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHUMX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHUMX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FHUMX (5.08M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FHUMX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FHUMX (0.00). FHUMX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FHUMX (6 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FHUMX (6.24) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FHUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHUMX: FSMDX (0) vs FHUMX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. FHUMX (5.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. FHUMX (6.38).
| FHUMX | FSMDX | FHUMX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 3,320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.24 | 0.03 | 24,960% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.865 | 11.996 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.08M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.67 | 22.46 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.59 | 59.36 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.38 | 42.72 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 166.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement