Ad is loading...
FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. FNORX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a StrongBuy and FNORX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 910M vs. FNORX (315M). FNORX pays higher dividends than FICDX: FNORX (3.76) vs FICDX (1.29). FICDX was incepted earlier than FNORX: FICDX (37 years) vs FNORX (30 years). FICDX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FNORX (0.87). FNORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FICDX (8.00). FICDX (0) and FNORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. FNORX (-4.29). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.98 vs. FNORX (64.31).
| FICDX | FNORX | FICDX / FNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.87 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.87 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.248 | 8.035 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 910M | 315M | 289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 3.76 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | -4.29 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.61 | 18.17 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.98 | 64.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.99 | 46.08 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...