Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison
Open Charts FICDX vs FNORX
FICDX vs FNORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICDX vs. FNORX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICDX is a Hold and FNORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICDX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. FNORX (358M). FNORX pays higher dividends than FICDX: FNORX (3.17) vs FICDX (0.68). FICDX was incepted earlier than FNORX: FICDX (39 years) vs FNORX (31 years). FNORX (0.86) and FICDX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . FNORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FICDX (17.00). FICDX (0) and FNORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.75 vs. FNORX (7.07). FICDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.22 vs. FNORX (5.12).
| FICDX | FNORX | FICDX / FNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.86 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.86 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.885 | 7.027 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 358M | 338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 3.17 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.75 | 7.07 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.16 | 34.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.22 | 5.12 | 903% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.55 | 64.96 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement