Ad is loading...
FICGX vs RGAFX
FICGX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAFX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$11.12
Change+$0.95 (+9.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$68.85
Change+$6.55 (+10.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
FICGX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. FICGX (410M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAFX (0.66) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FICGX (24 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAFX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.38 vs. RGAFX (-11.80). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.05 vs. FICGX (-5.96).
| FICGX | RGAFX | FICGX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.34 | 344% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.34 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.109 | -16.286 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 272B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.38 | -11.80 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.21 | -2.47 | 697% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.96 | 38.05 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.66 | 40.93 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...