Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGAHX
FICGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FICGX (837M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FICGX (0.00). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICGX (26 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FICGX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FICGX (29.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGAHX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. FICGX (-15.69).
| FICGX | RGAHX | FICGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.44 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.44 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.437 | 9.200 | 135% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 0.18 | 6,926% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 43.47 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.69 | 13.78 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.21 | 106.68 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement