Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$13.46
Change+$0.09 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.23M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change+$0.31 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FICGX (569M). FICGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGEBX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.18 vs. RGEBX (15.56). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.96 vs. FICGX (-2.78).
| FICGX | RGEBX | FICGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.603 | 13.942 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | 15.56 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.64 | 54.91 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.78 | 36.96 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.88 | 93.56 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement