Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGEBX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$14.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$0.80 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FICGX (597M). FICGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICGX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FICGX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGEBX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.75 vs. RGEBX (12.10). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.73 vs. FICGX (4.90).
| FICGX | RGEBX | FICGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.362 | 16.601 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.75 | 12.10 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 70.06 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.90 | 43.73 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.89 | 105.49 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement