Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FICGX (837M). FICGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICGX (26 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FICGX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FICGX (29.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGEBX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. FICGX (-15.69).
| FICGX | RGEBX | FICGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.08 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.08 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.437 | 8.727 | 143% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | -0.77 | -1,607% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 39.77 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.69 | 9.71 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.21 | 97.58 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement