Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGEBX
FICGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FICGX (780M). FICGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FICGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FICGX (26 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). FICGX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FICGX (29.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGEBX (250) vs FICGX (1000). FICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.51 vs. RGEBX (3.42). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. FICGX (-10.36).
| FICGX | RGEBX | FICGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.08 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.08 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.300 | 6.888 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 780M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.51 | 3.42 | 687% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.90 | 36.26 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.36 | 12.32 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.50 | 93.96 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement