Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGAHX
FICHX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FICHX (837M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FICHX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FICHX (0.00). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FICHX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FICHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FICHX (29.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FICHX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.15 vs. RGAHX (0.18). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. FICHX (-11.52).
| FICHX | RGAHX | FICHX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.44 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.692 | 9.200 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.15 | 0.18 | 7,320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.26 | 43.47 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.52 | 13.78 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.16 | 106.68 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement