Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICS vs IMTM
FICS vs IMTM Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs IMTM
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$38.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
Volume$200
Net Assets218.41M
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Price$47.17
Change-$0.32 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.17K
Net Assets3.37B
FICS vs IMTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. IMTM commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and IMTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMTM has more net assets: 3.37B vs. FICS (218M). IMTM has a higher annual dividend yield than FICS: IMTM (28.509) vs FICS (16.487). FICS was incepted earlier than IMTM: FICS (5 years) vs IMTM (11 years). IMTM (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than FICS (0.70). IMTM has a higher turnover FICS (59.00) vs FICS (59.00).
| FICS | IMTM | FICS / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 16.487 | 28.509 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 218M | 3.37B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.30 | 233% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 70.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 2.36 | 2.33 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| GSK - FICS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
IMTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| SAN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BN - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.85% | ||
| MFC - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| NWG - IMTM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||