Ad is loading...
FICS vs IMTM
FICS vs IMTM Comparison
Open Charts FICS vs IMTM
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
Price$37.08
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
Volume$680
Net Assets186.42M
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
Price$39.51
Change-$0.84 (-2.08%)
Volume$15.39K
Net Assets2.46B
FICS vs IMTM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICS vs. IMTM commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICS is a Hold and IMTM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMTM has more net assets: 2.46B vs. FICS (186M). FICS has a higher annual dividend yield than IMTM: FICS (9.345) vs IMTM (7.888). FICS was incepted earlier than IMTM: FICS (4 years) vs IMTM (10 years). IMTM (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than FICS (0.70). IMTM has a higher turnover FICS (58.00) vs FICS (58.00).
| FICS | IMTM | FICS / IMTM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.345 | 7.888 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 186M | 2.46B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.30 | 233% |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 70.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 2.12 | 2.75 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FICS | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FICS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICS has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FICS jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FICS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FICS | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| SLF - FICS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BMO - FICS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| TD - FICS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| SAN - FICS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| BHP - FICS | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||
IMTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| STM - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| BNS - IMTM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| TD - IMTM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BMO - IMTM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| RY - IMTM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||