Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FICWX vs HBLRX
FICWX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FICWX vs HBLRX
FICWX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICWX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICWX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FICWX (1.42B). FICWX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: FICWX (3.55) vs HBLRX (2.74). FICWX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FICWX (10 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FICWX (0.30). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FICWX (6.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICWX: HBLRX (0) vs FICWX (1000000). FICWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. HBLRX (1.21). FICWX return over 5 years is better than : 22.41 vs. HBLRX (3.00).
| FICWX | HBLRX | FICWX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.27 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.27 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.839 | 3.434 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 10.8B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 2.74 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 1.21 | 490% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 19.66 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.41 | 3.00 | 746% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement