Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.55
Change-$0.12 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.24M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.46
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.55M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.41) vs FIDAX (1.10). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. RMBLX (9.95). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 77.91 vs. FIDAX (16.86).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.378 | -4.479 | -75% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 205M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | 9.95 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.92 | -3.72 | -401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.86 | 77.91 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement