Ad is loading...
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$17.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.47M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.52M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. RMBLX (192M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.35) vs FIDAX (1.08). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. FIDAX (10.26). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.51 vs. FIDAX (27.35).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.13 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.13 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.384 | -5.261 | 26% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 360M | 192M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.35 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | 18.74 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.33 | -13.84 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.35 | 79.51 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...