Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.25
Change+$0.08 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.16M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$51.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.66M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a StrongBuy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. RMBLX (217M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.42) vs FIDAX (1.08). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.07 vs. FIDAX (15.52). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 110.64 vs. FIDAX (28.62).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.980 | 0.782 | 764% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 217M | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.52 | 25.07 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 8.22 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.62 | 110.64 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement