Ad is loading...
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$16.81
Change+$0.09 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.99M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$44.29
Change+$0.57 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. RMBLX (187M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.45) vs FIDAX (1.14). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. FIDAX (6.78). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 91.51 vs. FIDAX (23.60).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.13 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.13 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.420 | -13.378 | 55% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 187M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 16.73 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.72 | -15.31 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.60 | 91.51 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers