Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.44
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.39M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$51.24
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.16M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 281M vs. RMBLX (211M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.37) vs FIDAX (1.11). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.06 vs. FIDAX (-9.57). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 43.79 vs. FIDAX (4.62).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.717 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 211M | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.57 | -6.06 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.22 | -1.42 | -651% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | 43.79 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers