Ad is loading...
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.71M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.7M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.51) vs FIDAX (1.17). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.13). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. FIDAX (10.13). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 95.42 vs. FIDAX (29.33).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.13 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.13 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.554 | -5.770 | -10% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 205M | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.51 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 16.47 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | -2.35 | -529% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.33 | 95.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers