Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.95
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.41M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$52.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.46M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. RMBLX (219M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.34) vs FIDAX (1.08). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. FIDAX (4.91). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 75.06 vs. FIDAX (18.26).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.371 | 2.562 | 210% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 219M | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | 11.80 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.33 | 10.27 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | 75.06 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement