Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.80
Change+$0.24 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$46.67
Change-$0.25 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.78M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. RMBLX (199M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.45) vs FIDAX (1.11). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. FIDAX (13.79). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 58.76 vs. FIDAX (15.00).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.769 | -8.234 | -34% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 199M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 18.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.97 | -8.81 | -102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.00 | 58.76 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement