Ad is loading...
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.53
Change-$0.75 (-3.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$50.94
Change-$1.66 (-3.16%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. RMBLX (185M). FIDAX (1.62) and RMBLX (1.58) have matching dividends . FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (8 years). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RMBLX (49.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). FIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.28 vs. RMBLX (21.89). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 29.31 vs. FIDAX (9.48).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.290 | 19.913 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 185M | 275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.28 | 21.89 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.58 | -7.58 | -140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.48 | 29.31 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.22 | N/A | - |