Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.79M
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$53.62
Change-$0.21 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.96M
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Buy and RMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. RMBLX (222M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RMBLX (1.41) vs FIDAX (1.10). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (29 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.14). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FIDAX (61.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. FIDAX (8.33). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 94.53 vs. FIDAX (20.06).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.14 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.14 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.977 | 5.281 | 132% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302M | 222M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 11.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.85 | 8.02 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.06 | 94.53 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement