Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RMBLX
FIDAX vs RMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RMBLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. RMBLX (253M). RMBLX (0.93) and FIDAX (0.89) have matching dividends . FIDAX was incepted earlier than RMBLX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RMBLX (9 years). FIDAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMBLX (1.08). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RMBLX (50.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBLX: FIDAX (1000) vs RMBLX (100000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.98 vs. FIDAX (-23.71). RMBLX return over 5 years is better than : 30.54 vs. FIDAX (-29.97).
| FIDAX | RMBLX | FIDAX / RMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.08 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.08 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.723 | 18.447 | 31% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 253M | 110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.71 | 27.98 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.34 | 83.14 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.97 | 30.54 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers