Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDAX vs RYBKX
FIDAX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts FIDAX vs RYBKX
FIDAX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDAX vs. RYBKX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDAX is a Hold and RYBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. RYBKX (8.36M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: RYBKX (3.71) vs FIDAX (0.91). FIDAX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: FIDAX (30 years) vs RYBKX (22 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.30). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. FIDAX (63.00). FIDAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RYBKX (5%) vs RYBKX (5%). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: FIDAX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RYBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.22 vs. FIDAX (-28.39). RYBKX return over 5 years is better than : 32.30 vs. FIDAX (-38.15).
| FIDAX | RYBKX | FIDAX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.64 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.69 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.421 | 2.971 | -81% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 8.36M | 3,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 3.71 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.39 | 25.22 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.99 | 92.54 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.15 | 32.30 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.58 | 139.52 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement