Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDCX vs FSRBX
FIDCX vs FSRBX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs FSRBX
FIDCX vs FSRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. FSRBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Hold and FSRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRBX has more cash in the bank: 507M vs. FIDCX (279M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FSRBX (1.99) vs FIDCX (0.25). FIDCX was incepted earlier than FSRBX: FIDCX (28 years) vs FSRBX (40 years). FIDCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.69). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSRBX (25.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIDCX: FSRBX (0) vs FIDCX (1000). FSRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. FIDCX (-31.65). FSRBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.79 vs. FIDCX (-42.59).
| FIDCX | FSRBX | FIDCX / FSRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.69 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.69 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.790 | 12.243 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 507M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.99 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -31.65 | 12.74 | -248% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.33 | 94.26 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.59 | 51.79 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.44 | 73.97 | -33% |