Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs RPFGX
FIDSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs RPFGX
FIDSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. FIDSX (784M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FIDSX (1.72) vs RPFGX (1.37). FIDSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FIDSX (45 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.68). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RPFGX (10.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FIDSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. FIDSX (8.49). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.18 vs. FIDSX (39.81).
| FIDSX | RPFGX | FIDSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.94 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.94 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.689 | -2.558 | -27% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 784M | 1.13B | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.37 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 12.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.43 | 74.29 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.81 | 51.18 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.47 | 131.06 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement