Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs SBFAX
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs SBFAX
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
1919 Financial Services A
Price$29.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.18M
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. SBFAX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. SBFAX (110M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FIDSX (1.33) vs SBFAX (0.66). FIDSX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FIDSX (44 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FIDSX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.82 vs. SBFAX (-14.19). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.70 vs. SBFAX (12.89).
| FIDSX | SBFAX | FIDSX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.342 | 1.069 | 781% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 110M | 925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.66 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -14.19 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | -0.30 | -14,816% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.70 | 12.89 | 626% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 42.26 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement