Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIDSX vs SBFAX
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDSX vs SBFAX
FIDSX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDSX vs. SBFAX commentary
Aug 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDSX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 864M vs. SBFAX (97.5M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FIDSX (1.53) vs SBFAX (0.07). FIDSX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FIDSX (45 years) vs SBFAX (28 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.68). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SBFAX (9.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FIDSX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. SBFAX (-7.16). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.66 vs. SBFAX (-12.56).
| FIDSX | SBFAX | FIDSX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.221 | 5.333 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 864M | 97.5M | 886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.07 | 2,291% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | -7.16 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.18 | 11.86 | 634% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.66 | -12.56 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.40 | 45.23 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement