Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIFVX vs RGAGX
FIFVX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FIFVX vs RGAGX
FIFVX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIFVX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIFVX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FIFVX (215M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FIFVX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FIFVX (0.00). FIFVX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FIFVX (7 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FIFVX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FIFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FIFVX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FIFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.34 vs. RGAGX (4.75). FIFVX return over 5 years is better than : 54.70 vs. RGAGX (17.74).
| FIFVX | RGAGX | FIFVX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.549 | 7.335 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 215M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.34 | 4.75 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.38 | 41.00 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.70 | 17.74 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement