FIG
Price
$21.15
Change
+$1.15 (+5.75%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.57B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WK
Price
$52.44
Change
+$1.76 (+3.47%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.84B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIG vs WK

FIG vs WK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIG vs. WK commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIG is a StrongBuy and WK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (FIG: $20.00 vs. WK: $50.68)
Brand notoriety: FIG and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIG: 75% vs. WK: 70%
Market capitalization -- FIG: $10.57B vs. WK: $2.84B
FIG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $10.57B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $397.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIG is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIG is a better buy in the short-term than WK.

Price Growth

FIG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.57% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIG is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

WK is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIG($10.6B) has a higher market cap than WK($2.84B). WK YTD gains are higher at: -41.241 vs. FIG (-46.481). WK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41M vs. FIG (-1.45B). FIG has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. WK (863M). FIG has less debt than WK: FIG (56.2M) vs WK (793M). FIG has higher revenues than WK: FIG (1.16B) vs WK (926M).
FIGWKFIG / WK
Capitalization10.6B2.84B373%
EBITDA-1.45B41M-3,530%
Gain YTD-46.481-41.241113%
P/E RatioN/A211.17-
Revenue1.16B926M125%
Total Cash1.65B863M192%
Total Debt56.2M793M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIG vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
FIG
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
330
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1790

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIG's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

FIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

FIG's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

FIG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as WK (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIG (100) in the null industry. This means that WK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIGWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYY139.76N/A
N/A
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
PBJA32.30-0.09
-0.29%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jan
JLQD40.56-0.18
-0.44%
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
AQEC24.49-0.13
-0.53%
AQE Core ETF
HIX3.95-0.04
-1.00%
Western Asset High Income Fund II

FIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIG and NATL have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIG and NATL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIG
1D Price
Change %
FIG100%
-6.85%
NATL - FIG
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
INLX - FIG
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
STRK - FIG
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
WK - FIG
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
TYL - FIG
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
-2.63%
COIN - WK
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
CLSK - WK
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
APPF - WK
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
RIOT - WK
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
CRM - WK
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.72%
More