Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIMKX vs RNWFX
FIMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FIMKX vs RNWFX
FIMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIMKX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FIMKX (13.6B). FIMKX (1.26) and RNWFX (1.20) have matching dividends . FIMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FIMKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FIMKX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FIMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FIMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FIMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FIMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.10 vs. RNWFX (17.39). FIMKX return over 5 years is better than : 54.02 vs. RNWFX (18.43).
| FIMKX | RNWFX | FIMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.62 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.941 | 16.517 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.10 | 17.39 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.97 | 54.50 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 18.43 | 293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.74 | 114.22 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement