Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIMKX vs RNWHX
FIMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FIMKX vs RNWHX
FIMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIMKX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FIMKX (13.6B). FIMKX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FIMKX (1.26) vs RNWHX (1.15). FIMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FIMKX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FIMKX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FIMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FIMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FIMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FIMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.10 vs. RNWHX (17.19). FIMKX return over 5 years is better than : 54.02 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| FIMKX | RNWHX | FIMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.941 | 16.447 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.10 | 17.19 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.97 | 53.84 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 17.68 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.74 | 111.44 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers