FINV
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.25 (+3.70%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
56 days until earnings call
QD
Price
$2.64
Change
+$0.04 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
562.25M
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FINV vs QD

Header iconFINV vs QD Comparison
Open Charts FINV vs QDBanner chart's image
FinVolution Group
Price$7.00
Change+$0.25 (+3.70%)
Volume$719.32K
Capitalization1.41B
Qudian
Price$2.64
Change+$0.04 (+1.54%)
Volume$217.56K
Capitalization562.25M
FINV vs QD Comparison Chart
Loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FINV vs. QD commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINV is a Hold and QD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FINV: $7.00 vs. QD: $2.64)
Brand notoriety: FINV: Not notable vs. QD: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FINV: 103% vs. QD: 39%
Market capitalization -- FINV: $1.41B vs. QD: $562.25M
FINV [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.41B. QD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $562.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FINV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FINV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than QD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FINV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FINV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the short-term than QD.

Price Growth

FINV (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while QD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

QD is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINV($1.41B) has a higher market cap than QD($562M). QD has higher P/E ratio than FINV: QD (19.77) vs FINV (4.34). FINV YTD gains are higher at: 3.093 vs. QD (-6.383). FINV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.49B vs. QD (-339.48M). QD (8.79B) and FINV (8.53B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . QD has less debt than FINV: QD (9.37M) vs FINV (160M). FINV has higher revenues than QD: FINV (12.5B) vs QD (398M).
FINVQDFINV / QD
Capitalization1.41B562M251%
EBITDA2.49B-339.48M-733%
Gain YTD3.093-6.383-48%
P/E Ratio4.3419.7722%
Revenue12.5B398M3,141%
Total Cash8.53B8.79B97%
Total Debt160M9.37M1,708%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FINV vs QD: Fundamental Ratings
FINV
QD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8456
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
5491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
183
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FINV's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (68) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as QD (42) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew similarly to QD’s over the last 12 months.

QD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FINV (18) in the null industry. This means that QD’s stock grew similarly to FINV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FINVQD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAMAX13.880.15
+1.09%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl
PARNX58.200.45
+0.78%
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Investor
FGSRX130.950.31
+0.24%
Franklin Growth R
JAMEX34.180.05
+0.15%
Jamestown Equity
VIESX14.31N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap I

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
+3.70%
QFIN - FINV
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
LX - FINV
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.10%
LU - FINV
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
YRD - FINV
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.47%
LC - FINV
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
More

QD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QD has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QD jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QD
1D Price
Change %
QD100%
+1.54%
LX - QD
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.10%
FINV - QD
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
QFIN - QD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
GDOT - QD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
YRD - QD
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
More