FINV
Price
$9.63
Change
-$0.15 (-1.54%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.41B
60 days until earnings call
QD
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
562.25M
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FINV vs QD

Header iconFINV vs QD Comparison
Open Charts FINV vs QDBanner chart's image
FinVolution Group
Price$9.63
Change-$0.15 (-1.54%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.41B
Qudian
Price$2.87
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization562.25M
FINV vs QD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FINV vs. QD commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINV is a StrongBuy and QD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FINV: $9.77 vs. QD: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: FINV: Not notable vs. QD: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FINV: 115% vs. QD: 59%
Market capitalization -- FINV: $1.41B vs. QD: $562.25M
FINV [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.41B. QD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $562.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FINV’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FINV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than QD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FINV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FINV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the short-term than QD.

Price Growth

FINV (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.73% price change this week, while QD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

QD is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.83% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINV($1.41B) has a higher market cap than QD($562M). QD has higher P/E ratio than FINV: QD (19.77) vs FINV (4.34). FINV YTD gains are higher at: 49.323 vs. QD (1.418). FINV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.49B vs. QD (-339.48M). QD (8.79B) and FINV (8.53B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . QD has less debt than FINV: QD (9.37M) vs FINV (160M). FINV has higher revenues than QD: FINV (12.5B) vs QD (398M).
FINVQDFINV / QD
Capitalization1.41B562M251%
EBITDA2.49B-339.48M-733%
Gain YTD49.3231.4183,477%
P/E Ratio4.3419.7722%
Revenue12.5B398M3,141%
Total Cash8.53B8.79B97%
Total Debt160M9.37M1,708%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FINV vs QD: Fundamental Ratings
FINV
QD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
679
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2864
SMR RATING
1..100
5087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FINV's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (71) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (64) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (87) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as QD (47) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew similarly to QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QD (98) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew significantly faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FINVQD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JORRX19.31N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Select R
FTVFX33.84N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value M
SIBLX28.70N/A
N/A
Touchstone Balanced Y
TSLIX4.85N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value I
HNACX119.45N/A
N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Retirement

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
-0.31%
QFIN - FINV
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
LX - FINV
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
YRD - FINV
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
LU - FINV
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
XYF - FINV
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.12%
More

QD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QD has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QD jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QD
1D Price
Change %
QD100%
-0.35%
QFIN - QD
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
LX - QD
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
FINV - QD
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
YRD - QD
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
URI - QD
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More