Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQAX vs RLBAX
FIQAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIQAX vs RLBAX
FIQAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FIQAX (5.6B). FIQAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FIQAX (1.96) vs RLBAX (1.13). FIQAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FIQAX (8 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQAX (0.58). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FIQAX (29.00). FIQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FIQAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FIQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. RLBAX (10.43). RLBAX (28.18) and FIQAX (27.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FIQAX | RLBAX | FIQAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.32 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.096 | 7.908 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.13 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 10.43 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.10 | 35.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.12 | 28.18 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement