Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQAX vs RLBAX
FIQAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIQAX vs RLBAX
FIQAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FIQAX (5.61B). FIQAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FIQAX (1.95) vs RLBAX (1.14). FIQAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FIQAX (8 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQAX (0.58). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FIQAX (29.00). FIQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FIQAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FIQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. RLBAX (15.80). RLBAX (31.83) and FIQAX (30.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FIQAX | RLBAX | FIQAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.32 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.32 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.446 | 8.988 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.14 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 15.80 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.72 | 41.07 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 31.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement