Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQDX vs HBLCX
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FIQDX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret Z
Price$8.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets488.05M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.79B
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQDX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQDX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FIQDX (488M). FIQDX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FIQDX (4.78) vs HBLCX (2.65). FIQDX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FIQDX (7 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FIQDX (0.67). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FIQDX (23.00). FIQDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FIQDX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FIQDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. HBLCX (3.54). FIQDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.72 vs. HBLCX (11.89).
| FIQDX | HBLCX | FIQDX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.64 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.169 | 3.515 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 488M | 11.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 2.65 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 3.54 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.57 | 13.04 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.72 | 11.89 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers