Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQDX vs HBLCX
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FIQDX vs HBLCX
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQDX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQDX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FIQDX (592M). FIQDX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FIQDX (4.20) vs HBLCX (2.49). FIQDX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FIQDX (8 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FIQDX (0.68). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FIQDX (29.00). FIQDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FIQDX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FIQDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. HBLCX (4.11). FIQDX return over 5 years is better than : 33.24 vs. HBLCX (1.89).
| FIQDX | HBLCX | FIQDX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.65 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.222 | 3.319 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 2.49 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 4.11 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.30 | 17.42 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.24 | 1.89 | 1,760% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement