Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQDX vs HBLCX
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FIQDX vs HBLCX
FIQDX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQDX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQDX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FIQDX (529M). FIQDX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FIQDX (4.66) vs HBLCX (2.45). FIQDX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FIQDX (8 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FIQDX (0.68). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FIQDX (29.00). FIQDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FIQDX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). FIQDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.25 vs. HBLCX (4.31). FIQDX return over 5 years is better than : 37.91 vs. HBLCX (2.30).
| FIQDX | HBLCX | FIQDX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.65 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.372 | 5.869 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.66 | 2.45 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.25 | 4.31 | 377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.49 | 20.09 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.91 | 2.30 | 1,650% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement