Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQGX vs RNWHX
FIQGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FIQGX vs RNWHX
FIQGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. FIQGX (1.51B). FIQGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FIQGX (2.66) vs RNWHX (1.15). FIQGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FIQGX (8 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FIQGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FIQGX (38.00). FIQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FIQGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FIQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.04 vs. RNWHX (29.50). FIQGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. RNWHX (19.26).
| FIQGX | RNWHX | FIQGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.72 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.72 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.343 | 16.719 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 85.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.15 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.04 | 29.50 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.11 | 56.33 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 19.26 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement