Ad is loading...
FIQZX vs NMBAX
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIQZX vs NMBAX
Fidelity Advisor Interm Muni Inc Z
Price$10.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.11B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.66B
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQZX vs. NMBAX commentary
Jan 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQZX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQZX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. NMBAX (7.66B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than FIQZX: NMBAX (2.68) vs FIQZX (2.55). FIQZX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: FIQZX (6 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FIQZX (14.00). FIQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: FIQZX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. FIQZX (1.13). FIQZX return over 5 years is better than : 4.87 vs. NMBAX (3.42).
| FIQZX | NMBAX | FIQZX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.496 | -0.456 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 7.66B | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 2.68 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.13 | 1.37 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | -1.31 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.87 | 3.42 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers