Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQZX vs NMBAX
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIQZX vs NMBAX
Fidelity Advisor Interm Muni Inc Z
Price$10.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.16B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.89B
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQZX vs. NMBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQZX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQZX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. NMBAX (7.89B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than FIQZX: NMBAX (3.10) vs FIQZX (2.84). FIQZX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: FIQZX (7 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FIQZX (0.32). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FIQZX (19.00). FIQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: FIQZX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). FIQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.55 vs. NMBAX (0.33). FIQZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.99 vs. NMBAX (2.87).
| FIQZX | NMBAX | FIQZX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.65 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.65 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.083 | 0.780 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 7.89B | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 0.33 | 463% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.49 | 5.35 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.99 | 2.87 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers