Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQZX vs NMBAX
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIQZX vs NMBAX
FIQZX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQZX vs. NMBAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQZX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQZX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. NMBAX (9.25B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than FIQZX: NMBAX (3.27) vs FIQZX (3.04). FIQZX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: FIQZX (8 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). NMBAX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FIQZX (0.32). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FIQZX (15.00). FIQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: FIQZX (0) vs NMBAX (2500). FIQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.57 vs. NMBAX (-0.93). FIQZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.26 vs. NMBAX (0.79).
| FIQZX | NMBAX | FIQZX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.63 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.63 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.930 | -2.214 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 9.25B | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.27 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.57 | -0.93 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.10 | 8.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.26 | 0.79 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers