This stock comparison examines FIS (Fidelity National Information Services) and HCKT (The Hackett Group), two players in technology services with exposure to financial sectors. FIS provides banking and payments solutions, while HCKT specializes in AI-driven consulting and digital transformation. Traders seeking relative performance insights in fintech and IT consulting, and investors evaluating stability versus growth potential, will find value here. Recent market activity has pressured both, but differing business models and catalysts offer trade-offs in momentum, valuation, and sector trends.
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, delivers technology solutions for financial institutions across banking, capital markets, and payments. Its segments include Banking Solutions and Capital Markets Solutions, processing transactions for merchants and banks globally.
In recent market activity, FIS shares have hovered around $47, with a 52-week range of $43-$83 and a market cap near $24 billion. The stock posted a 1-month gain of about 1% but faces year-to-date losses of 29% and a 40% one-year decline, influenced by regulatory focus on core banking providers and a new clearing product launch amid weak momentum. Q4 2025 results showed adjusted revenue growth of 5.8% and EPS up over 10% to $5.75, with 2026 guidance projecting 30-31% adjusted revenue growth pro forma. Sentiment reflects undervaluation, with analyst targets around $67 versus current levels.
The Hackett Group (HCKT), based in Miami, Florida, offers intellectual property-based consulting in generative AI strategy, digital transformation, and executive advisory. It operates through Global Strategy & Business Transformation, Oracle Solutions, and SAP Solutions segments, with platforms like Hackett AI XPLR for AI assessments.
Recent weeks have seen HCKT shares near $13, with a 52-week range of $12-$27 and a $340 million market cap. Performance includes a 2% one-month rise but year-to-date and one-year drops of 32% and 47%, respectively, amid segment shifts to AI services. Q4 2025 revenues before reimbursements hit $74.8 million, with adjusted EPS of $0.40 meeting guidance highs, though Global S&BT declined 11% year-over-year. Key developments include Spring 2026 SolutionMap for procurement tech and collaborations like IBM for AI prioritization, boosting AI focus but pressuring near-term guidance.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and volatility plays, with timeframes from 1 day to 49 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +162%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors from 1.51 to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 17.02. Examples: a semiconductors bot with +84% return and 68% win rate, or a volatility bot yielding +162% on select tickers. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot, offering real-time signals for copy trading via virtual or brokerage agents. Explore these high performers to enhance your strategy.
FIS and HCKT diverge in scale and focus: FIS's established banking tech model drives recurring revenue stability, contrasting HCKT's consulting emphasis on emerging Gen AI (generative artificial intelligence) tools. Growth drivers differ—FIS leverages payments volume and international expansion, while HCKT bets on AI platforms like AskHackett amid procurement AI adoption doubling year-over-year.
Recent momentum favors neither strongly, with both rebounding modestly short-term but lagging broader indices year-to-date. Risk factors include regulatory oversight for FIS and transition costs for HCKT's AI shift. Sector exposure positions FIS in fintech infrastructure (less volatile) versus HCKT's IT services (growth-oriented but cyclical). Market sentiment views FIS as undervalued with firmer guidance, while HCKT trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of ~12x but faces softer Q1 outlook.
Tickeron’s AI analysis currently favors FIS over HCKT for short-term positioning, citing superior trend consistency, larger scale stability, and relative undervaluation amid recent recoveries. FIS's pro forma growth outlook and analyst consensus enhance probabilistic edge, though HCKT's AI catalysts could narrow the gap post-earnings. Observable factors like momentum signals and sector rotation tilt toward FIS in prevailing conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCKT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCKT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FIS (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -3.89% price change this week, while HCKT (@Information Technology Services) price change was -11.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.
FIS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
HCKT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| FIS | HCKT | FIS / HCKT | |
| Capitalization | 21.6B | 238M | 9,076% |
| EBITDA | 3.45B | 33.6M | 10,268% |
| Gain YTD | -36.564 | -51.373 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.10 | 18.17 | 45% |
| Revenue | 10.7B | 297M | 3,603% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 6.07M | - |
| Total Debt | 13.1B | 81.1M | 16,153% |
FIS | HCKT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 18 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCKT's Valuation (5) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FIS (8) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HCKT’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
HCKT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FIS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HCKT’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
HCKT's SMR Rating (55) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIS (88) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HCKT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIS’s over the last 12 months.
FIS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as HCKT (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FIS’s stock grew similarly to HCKT’s over the last 12 months.
HCKT's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FIS (99) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HCKT’s stock grew similarly to FIS’s over the last 12 months.
| FIS | HCKT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 50% | 13 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 44% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCKT has been loosely correlated with CDW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCKT jumps, then CDW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCKT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCKT | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| CDW - HCKT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ACN - HCKT | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| FIS - HCKT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| DXC - HCKT | 49% Loosely correlated | +8.76% | ||
| VYX - HCKT | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.90% | ||
More | ||||