Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISCX vs NCIAX
FISCX vs NCIAX Comparison
Open Charts FISCX vs NCIAX
Franklin Convertible Securities A
Price$24.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.87B
Columbia Convertible Securities Inst
Price$23.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
FISCX vs NCIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISCX vs. NCIAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISCX is a Sell and NCIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FISCX has more cash in the bank: 2.87B vs. NCIAX (1.17B). NCIAX pays higher dividends than FISCX: NCIAX (2.00) vs FISCX (1.34). FISCX was incepted earlier than NCIAX: FISCX (38 years) vs NCIAX (26 years). NCIAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FISCX (0.84). NCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FISCX (37.31). FISCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCIAX: FISCX (1000) vs NCIAX (2000). NCIAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FISCX: NCIAX (1000) vs FISCX (250). NCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FISCX (15.47). NCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.45 vs. FISCX (-6.37).
| FISCX | NCIAX | FISCX / NCIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.83 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.235 | 9.211 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.87B | 1.17B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 2.00 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.47 | 19.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.25 | 25.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.37 | 2.45 | -260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.69 | 58.66 | 83% |