Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISGX vs FSMAX
FISGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FISGX vs FSMAX
FISGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FISGX (183M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FISGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FISGX (0.00). FISGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FISGX (37 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FISGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISGX: FSMAX (0) vs FISGX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. FISGX (11.86). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. FISGX (-15.90).
| FISGX | FSMAX | FISGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.04 | 2,514% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.152 | 20.344 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 25.93 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.07 | 74.27 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.90 | 40.97 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.36 | 144.05 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers