Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FISRX (80.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FISRX (5.03) vs RLBFX (2.05). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FISRX (25 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FISRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBFX (250) vs FISRX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. FISRX (10.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. FISRX (31.17).
| FISRX | RLBFX | FISRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.882 | 10.287 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 283B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.03 | 2.05 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 12.94 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.00 | 46.32 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | 35.73 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.29 | 86.86 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement