Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FISRX (79.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FISRX (5.00) vs RLBFX (2.03). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FISRX (25 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FISRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBFX (250) vs FISRX (1000). FISRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. RLBFX (6.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. FISRX (30.23).
| FISRX | RLBFX | FISRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.053 | 8.705 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5B | 285B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.00 | 2.03 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 6.98 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.13 | 42.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.23 | 33.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.88 | 87.98 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement