Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBFX
FISRX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FISRX (79.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FISRX (5.04) vs RLBFX (2.03). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FISRX (25 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FISRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBFX (250) vs FISRX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. FISRX (10.16). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. FISRX (29.50).
| FISRX | RLBFX | FISRX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.30 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.155 | 8.732 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.5B | 288B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 2.03 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 12.40 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.83 | 40.94 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.50 | 34.75 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.67 | 85.40 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers