FITB
Price
$45.92
Change
+$0.92 (+2.04%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.78B
30 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$45.37
Change
+$0.81 (+1.82%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.46B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FITB vs TFC

Header iconFITB vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts FITB vs TFCBanner chart's image
Fifth Third Ban
Price$45.92
Change+$0.92 (+2.04%)
Volume$145.82K
Capitalization29.78B
Truist Financial
Price$45.37
Change+$0.81 (+1.82%)
Volume$61.92K
Capitalization57.46B
FITB vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITB vs. TFC commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITB is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FITB: $45.91 vs. TFC: $45.38)
Brand notoriety: FITB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITB: 107% vs. TFC: 120%
Market capitalization -- FITB: $29.78B vs. TFC: $57.46B
FITB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.78B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FITB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FITB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FITB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FITB and TFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FITB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($57.5B) has a higher market cap than FITB($29.8B). FITB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: FITB (14.30) vs TFC (12.30). FITB YTD gains are higher at: 10.617 vs. TFC (8.521). FITB has less debt than TFC: FITB (17.6B) vs TFC (61.1B). TFC has higher revenues than FITB: TFC (20B) vs FITB (8.45B).
FITBTFCFITB / TFC
Capitalization29.8B57.5B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.6178.521125%
P/E Ratio14.3012.30116%
Revenue8.45B20B42%
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total Debt17.6B61.1B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITB vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
FITB
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3766
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2333
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (66) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (33) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (44) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HPI17.160.14
+0.82%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
IYF126.110.99
+0.79%
iShares US Financials ETF
SDCP26.010.01
+0.03%
Virtus Newfleet Short Dur Cor Pls Bd ETF
PIEQ31.33-0.03
-0.10%
Principal International Equity ETF
OWNS17.64-0.04
-0.20%
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF

FITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITB
1D Price
Change %
FITB100%
+2.02%
PNC - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
HBAN - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
RF - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
CFG - FITB
90%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
USB - FITB
89%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
More