FITB
Price
$33.75
Change
-$1.72 (-4.85%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
25.43B
11 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$34.79
Change
-$2.25 (-6.07%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
52.02B
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FITB vs TFC

Header iconFITB vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts FITB vs TFCBanner chart's image
Fifth Third Ban
Price$33.75
Change-$1.72 (-4.85%)
Volume$9.71M
Capitalization25.43B
Truist Financial
Price$34.79
Change-$2.25 (-6.07%)
Volume$21.42M
Capitalization52.02B
FITB vs TFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITB vs. TFC commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITB is a StrongBuy and TFC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FITB: $33.75 vs. TFC: $34.79)
Brand notoriety: FITB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITB: 207% vs. TFC: 249%
Market capitalization -- FITB: $25.43B vs. TFC: $52.02B
FITB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.43B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FITB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FITB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than FITB.

Price Growth

FITB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -12.20% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FITB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-4.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than FITB($25.4B). FITB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: FITB (11.40) vs TFC (7.93). TFC (-18.894) and FITB (-19.407) have similar YTD gains . FITB has less debt than TFC: FITB (18.9B) vs TFC (59.7B). TFC has higher revenues than FITB: TFC (23.4B) vs FITB (8.54B).
FITBTFCFITB / TFC
Capitalization25.4B52B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.407-18.894103%
P/E Ratio11.407.93144%
Revenue8.54B23.4B37%
Total CashN/A5.07B-
Total Debt18.9B59.7B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITB vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
FITB
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3873
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (73) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (5) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (66) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNDI1.32-0.03
-2.22%
Kandi Technologies Group
MD13.51-0.63
-4.46%
Pediatrix Medical Group
ATHM25.88-1.44
-5.27%
Autohome
UPXI2.02-0.14
-6.48%
Upexi Inc
STX66.73-4.80
-6.71%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC

FITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITB
1D Price
Change %
FITB100%
-4.85%
PNC - FITB
89%
Closely correlated
-5.08%
FNB - FITB
88%
Closely correlated
-5.05%
HBAN - FITB
87%
Closely correlated
-6.39%
RF - FITB
87%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
TFC - FITB
86%
Closely correlated
-6.07%
More