FITB
Price
$58.06
Change
+$0.12 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
52.65B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFC
Price
$53.10
Change
+$0.11 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
64.87B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FITB vs TFC

FITB vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITB vs. TFC commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITB is a Hold and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FITB: $58.06 vs. TFC: $53.10)
Brand notoriety: FITB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITB: 76% vs. TFC: 55%
Market capitalization -- FITB: $52.65B vs. TFC: $64.87B
FITB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $52.65B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $64.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FITB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FITB and TFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FITB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than FITB.

Price Growth

FITB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.70% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($64.9B) has a higher market cap than FITB($52.7B). FITB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: FITB (19.55) vs TFC (12.21). FITB YTD gains are higher at: 26.042 vs. TFC (11.236). FITB has less debt than TFC: FITB (19.5B) vs TFC (69.9B). TFC has higher revenues than FITB: TFC (20.8B) vs FITB (9.48B).
FITBTFCFITB / TFC
Capitalization52.7B64.9B81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.04211.236232%
P/E Ratio19.5512.21160%
Revenue9.48B20.8B46%
Total CashN/A4.71B-
Total Debt19.5B69.9B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITB vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
FITB
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2683
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3976
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FITB (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (76) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (37) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (49) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FITB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIGA3.000.12
+4.17%
SIGA Technologies
TER418.798.27
+2.01%
Teradyne
SCSC53.190.86
+1.64%
ScanSource
IEP7.42-0.08
-1.07%
Icahn Enterprises LP
QNME0.46-0.10
-17.41%
Quanome Technologies Inc

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.20%
RF - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
KEY - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
FITB - TFC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
MTB - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
CFG - TFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More