FITBI
Price
$25.60
Change
-$0.12 (-0.47%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
MGYR
Price
$14.11
Change
-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Updated
Mar 11, 03:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.86M
Ad is loading...

FITBI vs MGYR

Header iconFITBI vs MGYR Comparison
Open Charts FITBI vs MGYRBanner chart's image
Fifth Third Ban
Price$25.60
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Magyar Ban
Price$14.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$400
Capitalization73.86M
FITBI vs MGYR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FITBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITBI vs. MGYR commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITBI is a Buy and MGYR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FITBI: $25.72 vs. MGYR: $14.60)
Brand notoriety: FITBI and MGYR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITBI: 298% vs. MGYR: 42%
Market capitalization -- FITBI: $0 vs. MGYR: $73.86M
FITBI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MGYR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITBI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGYR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FITBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGYR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FITBI and MGYR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITBI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FITBI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FITBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while MGYR (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGYR is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITBI YTD gains are higher at: 1.580 vs. MGYR (0.413). MGYR has less debt than FITBI: MGYR (28.8M) vs FITBI (18.9B). FITBI has higher revenues than MGYR: FITBI (8.54B) vs MGYR (30.7M).
FITBIMGYRFITBI / MGYR
CapitalizationN/A73.9M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.5800.413383%
P/E RatioN/A61.67-
Revenue8.54B30.7M27,827%
Total CashN/A3.13M-
Total Debt18.9B28.8M65,625%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITBI vs MGYR: Fundamental Ratings
FITBI
MGYR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8321
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5548
SMR RATING
1..100
10057
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5094
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FITBI's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGYR (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGYR’s over the last 12 months.

MGYR's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FITBI (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FITBI’s over the last 12 months.

MGYR's SMR Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FITBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FITBI’s over the last 12 months.

FITBI's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGYR (94) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGYR’s over the last 12 months.

MGYR's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FITBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MGYR’s stock grew similarly to FITBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FITBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AR34.691.05
+3.12%
ANTERO RESOURCES Corp
DDT25.990.02
+0.10%
Dillard's Capital Trust I
PLMR126.23-1.33
-1.04%
Palomar Holdings
QUIK5.86-0.34
-5.41%
QuickLogic Corp
GRPN9.83-0.71
-6.74%
Groupon

FITBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITBI has been loosely correlated with WTFCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITBI jumps, then WTFCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITBI
1D Price
Change %
FITBI100%
-0.19%
WTFCP - FITBI
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
WSBCP - FITBI
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
OCFCP - FITBI
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
PNFPP - FITBI
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
FFWM - FITBI
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.38%
More

MGYR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGYR has been loosely correlated with OCFCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGYR jumps, then OCFCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGYR
1D Price
Change %
MGYR100%
+0.34%
OCFCP - MGYR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
FITBI - MGYR
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
LSBK - MGYR
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
FFNW - MGYR
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
WAFDP - MGYR
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More