Ad is loading...
FITE vs IYW
FITE vs IYW Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs IYW
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Price$66.82
Change-$2.37 (-3.43%)
Volume$8.84K
Net Assets91.53M
iShares US Technology ETF
Price$161.55
Change-$4.34 (-2.62%)
Volume$593.46K
Net Assets20.29B
FITE vs IYW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. IYW commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 20.3B vs. FITE (91.5M). IYW has a higher annual dividend yield than FITE: IYW (1.273) vs FITE (-0.231). FITE was incepted earlier than IYW: FITE (7 years) vs IYW (25 years). FITE has a higher turnover IYW (10.00) vs IYW (10.00).
| FITE | IYW | FITE / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | -0.231 | 1.273 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 91.5M | 20.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 10.00 | 330% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.34 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been loosely correlated with PL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then PL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | -3.42% | ||
| PL - FITE | 62% Loosely correlated | -8.81% | ||
| RKLB - FITE | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.77% | ||
| DRS - FITE | 56% Loosely correlated | -7.53% | ||
| DDOG - FITE | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| NET - FITE | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.83% | ||
More | ||||
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -2.62% | ||
| CDNS - IYW | 81% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| KLAC - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| SNPS - IYW | 79% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| AMAT - IYW | 78% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| MSFT - IYW | 75% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||