Ad is loading...
FITE vs IYW
FITE vs IYW Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs IYW
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Price$60.76
Change-$0.09 (-0.15%)
Volume$4.86K
Net Assets79.71M
iShares US Technology ETF
Price$131.33
Change-$0.80 (-0.61%)
Volume$838.72K
Net Assets16.54B
FITE vs IYW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. IYW commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Hold and IYW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 16.5B vs. FITE (79.7M). FITE has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: FITE (-9.206) vs IYW (-17.630). FITE was incepted earlier than IYW: FITE (7 years) vs IYW (25 years). IYW (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FITE (0.45). FITE has a higher turnover IYW (11.00) vs IYW (11.00).
| FITE | IYW | FITE / IYW | |
| Gain YTD | -9.206 | -17.630 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 79.7M | 16.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.39 | 115% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 11.00 | 291% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.23 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| SANM - FITE | 70% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PL - FITE | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| RKLB - FITE | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| DDOG - FITE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| OII - FITE | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| CDNS - IYW | 81% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LRCX - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| ENTG - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| KLAC - IYW | 80% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| SNPS - IYW | 79% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||